Worked example · Dance · Year 11
DCF: Producing → Evaluating and improving digital content
A secure Year 11 response, annotated so you can see which success criterion each part meets. It is also the answer key. Question 1: (a) canon; (b) dance for camera and site specific; (c) narrative / episodic; (d) retrograde. Question 4(a): 352 viewers lost between minutes 5 and 6, which is 37.9% of the 928 lost over the whole film. The key idea to look for in Question 3: the camera adds meaning a theatre seat could not, but two editing choices weaken the human story. Practises GCSE Dance Unit 3: Dance Appreciation, content 3.1.1 to 3.1.3, on an unseen work.
(a) ☑ canon (b) ☑ dance for camera ☑ site specific (c) ☑ narrative / episodic (d) Retrograde.
(c): the programme note describes three separate episodes following a story from work to closure to memory. Evidences criterion 2.
(a) The grey and brown work shirts dusted with black (03:00) show that the dancers are miners and suggest the coal and the hard, dirty labour. Mali wears red, the only strong colour in the film (07:20), so she stands out as the new generation who carries the memory forward.
(b) The sampled pit hooter sounds three times at 03:40 and then the brass band stops. A hooter marked the shifts at a colliery, so it signals the end, and the silence that follows makes the closure feel empty and final.
(c) At 02:10 the low-angle tracking shot moves along the line at the speed of the canon, so the audience travels with the dancers and sees each strike up close; a theatre audience would only see the line from the front. At 09:10 the drone shot shows the circle from high above, so it looks like a turning winding wheel; from a theatre seat the circle would be seen side-on and the image would be lost.
Every answer gives a time and moves from what is seen to what it suggests. Part (c) makes the comparison with a proscenium arch audience explicit, which is what the question asks. Evidences criteria 1 and 2.
| Area | Strength | Weakness or limit |
|---|---|---|
| Movement and devices | 07:20 mirroring: Mali copies Emrys until exact, the motif is handed on. 08:30 accumulation of dancers: the community rebuilds. | 04:30 contact work is strong, but in slow motion for 1 min 40 s it becomes repetitive. |
| Camera and editing | 02:10 tracking shot joins the canon. 00:40 close-ups make the labour physical. | 09:10 drone shot: Emrys becomes a dot (Review 2). Slow motion: 11 points lost, minute 5 to 6. |
| Physical setting | Site specific engine house, then the open mountain: from closure to open air and memory. Mali in red. | Head torches at 06:10 hide faces just as the key line is spoken. |
| Aural setting | Pit hooter at 03:40; brass band returns in a major key at 08:30: hope. | No subtitles for “Roedden ni’n un”: the theme is lost for non-Welsh speakers. |
Strengths and weaknesses in every row, each with a time. This is what makes the extended answer evaluative rather than a description of the film. Evidences criteria 1 and 4.
Gwythïen suggests that although the pits have closed, the miners’ teamwork survives in the body and can be handed on, and the camera is central to how clearly this is communicated. In section A the tracking shot at 02:10 is highly effective. As the digging motif passes down the diagonal line in canon, the camera moves at the speed of the canon, so each dancer strikes as we reach them, like a cage passing men at work. A theatre audience would see the canon but not be carried through it. The close-ups of gripping hands and stamping boots at 00:40 make the labour feel heavy and real. Section B is less successful. The hard cut to black and the pit hooter at 03:40 mark the closure sharply, and the contact work, where dancers catch each other until nobody is left to catch the last one, shows a community losing its support. However, the slow motion lasts 1 minute 40 seconds, and 11% of the original viewers left between minutes 5 and 6, which suggests it drains the tension rather than building it. Section C communicates the handing on most clearly. Mali, in the film’s only red, mirrors Emrys until she is exact, and the accumulation of dancers climbing the hill shows the community rebuilding. The drone shot at 09:10 turns the circle into a winding wheel, a powerful image of the industry, but it shrinks Emrys to a dot at the moment the motif is passed on. The extreme close-up of their hands in retrograde partly rescues this, suggesting memory running back through the generations. Overall the film is effective: the camera adds meaning that a theatre seat could not, although the slow motion and the height of the drone shot sometimes weaken the human story.
296 words. Opens with the implied meaning, then works through the three sections in order. Every point has a time or a figure, uses dance terminology precisely (canon, contact work, mirroring, accumulation, retrograde) and ends with a judgement of how effective it is. It compares screen with theatre, credits the film’s best choices and names two weaknesses with evidence, then returns to an overall judgement. Evidences criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4.
(a) Minute 5: 88% of 3,200 = 0.88 × 3,200 = 2,816. Minute 6: 0.77 × 3,200 = 2,464. Lost: 2,816 − 2,464 = 352 viewers. Whole film: 3,200 − (0.71 × 3,200) = 3,200 − 2,272 = 928 lost. 352 ÷ 928 × 100 = 37.9%. More than a third of all the viewers who left did so in that one minute of slow motion.
| Problem and source | Change: time, shot, length | How it communicates the meaning better | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The slow motion is too long. Review 1: “by the second, it feels as if the film has stopped breathing”. 352 viewers lost in minute 5 to 6. Comment: “went on forever”. | Cut the slow motion (04:30 to 06:10) from 1 minute 40 seconds to about 50 seconds. Keep the first fall and the final fall where nobody is left to catch the dancer; cut the jump cuts in between. | The collapse stays heavy but does not lose its tension, so the final unsupported fall lands as the moment the community breaks. More viewers stay for section C, where the meaning is resolved. |
| 2 | No subtitles for the voice-over at 06:10. Comment: “What does the old man say in the dark? Subtitles please!” | Add optional English subtitles, “We were one.”, for 06:10 to 06:20, and keep the Welsh audio. | The line states the film’s theme. With it, every viewer can connect the contact work in section B to the circle in section C. The Welsh voice stays, so the film keeps its sense of place. |
| 3 | The drone shot loses Emrys at the key moment. Review 2: “he becomes a dot”. Comment: “I wanted to see Emrys’s face”. | 09:10 to 10:10: shorten the drone shot from 60 to about 35 seconds. Before it, cut in a close-up of Emrys’s face as Mali gets the motif right, cropped from the 07:20 two-shot footage. | The audience sees the human moment of handing on first, then the winding wheel, so the film shows both the person and the industry he stands for. |
(c) I would listen to both, but act on Review 2. Review 3 and the viewer whose taid “worked under that wheel” show the drone image carries real meaning, so I would keep it. But Review 2 is right that the story is about people, so the face must come first and the drone shot should be shorter.
The calculation is correct and interpreted. Each change answers a problem with named evidence, is specific enough for an editor to act on (time, shot, new length) and uses only footage the company already has. Part (c) weighs two critical sources against each other and justifies a decision. Evidences criteria 1, 4 and 5.