Worked example · Science · Year 9
DCF: Producing → Sourcing, searching and planning digital content
A secure Year 9 research plan, annotated against the success criteria. Answer key for Step 1: tidal is the only resource that is impossible, because the village is 30 km from the sea. Step 4: results 1 and 3 are the strongest (Use). Results 4 and 7 are useful with care. Results 2, 5, 6 and 8 should be rejected. The scores here were judged in 2026. Allow a point either way per question if the pupil's reason is sound, and check that each decision follows from the pupil's own scores.
| Resource | Energy store | Predictable? | Possible in Bryn Ysgawen? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wind | Kinetic (moving air) | No | Yes. The ridge catches the prevailing south-westerly wind. But a turbine there would be seen from a popular walking path. |
| Hydroelectric | Gravitational potential (water high up) | Partly | Yes. Nant Ysgawen drops 60 m in 1 km, which is a big head of water. Output falls in dry summers. |
| Solar | Energy arrives by light from the Sun | Partly | Yes. The school and village hall have large south-facing roofs. |
| Tidal | Kinetic (moving sea water) | Yes, years ahead | No. The village is 30 km from the sea. |
| Biomass | Chemical (in wood) | Yes, if fuel is stored | Possibly. The brief does not mention woodland, so we would have to find out. It gives heat, which could replace the oil. |
Every energy store is correct, and every “possible?” answer quotes a fact from the brief. Tidal is ruled out on evidence rather than opinion, and the biomass answer admits what we don't yet know. Evidences criterion 1.
Main question: Which renewable source, hydro from Nant Ysgawen, wind on the ridge or solar on the school and hall roofs, would give Bryn Ysgawen the most reliable electricity for the lowest cost with the least harm to the landscape?
The main question names the place, the three real options and the three things that decide between them. Each smaller question could be answered by research, and together they cover the science, the site and the people. Evidences criterion 2.
| Question | Exactly what I would type | What it leaves out |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | hydro wind solar output by month "capacity factor" site:ac.uk | Only university pages, so no adverts or sellers. The quotation marks find the exact technical term. |
| 2 | "run of river" hydro Wales "dry summer" -sale | “-sale” cuts out companies trying to sell turbines. The quotation marks keep “dry summer” together, so I get pages about low-flow problems. |
| 3 | "community energy" Wales report filetype:pdf | Only full PDF reports, not short news stories or opinion posts. |
Each search is short keywords, not a sentence, and each uses a technique for a stated reason: to remove sellers, to keep a phrase together or to find full reports. Evidences criterion 3.
| Result | Who | When | Why | Evid. | Total | Decision and reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | Use. The Welsh Government's own statistics, updated in August 2026, with figures. |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Reject. A sponsored advert from a company selling wind turbines. “GUARANTEED” with no figures. |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | Use. The public body for Wales's environment. No date is shown, but its newest figure is from 2021, so I check the date on the page. |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | Use with care. Anyone can edit it and its newest figure is from 2019. I would use its references to find the original sources, but not quote it. |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Reject. Anonymous, from 2014, and only someone's uncle's opinion. |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Reject. From 2012, about a subsidy scheme that closed to new applicants in 2019, so the advice is out of date. |
| 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | Use with care. Real monthly figures from a village-sized hydro scheme, dry summer included. But it is one scheme, and the group is proud of it. |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Reject. Made for views, not facts, and no date. |
(a) More trustworthy. The page says openly that there was an error, what it affected and how much the figure changed (54% to 55%). An organisation that checks its data and publishes corrections is doing what it should. It does mean I must use the latest version and write down the date I looked.
(b) They are for different years, 2019 and 2024, and Wales could have added a lot of wind and solar in five years. They may also be calculated in different ways or from different data, so I would not put them side by side without reading how each was worked out. I would quote a figure with its year and its source, for example: “Renewable generation was equivalent to 55% of the electricity Wales used in 2024 (Welsh Government, 2026).”
Every decision follows from the scores, and every score has a reason. The pupil treats a published correction as a sign of quality rather than a weakness, and will not compare two figures without checking their years and methods. Evidences criterion 4.
| Question | Start with | What exactly I need | How I will record it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The fact card, then my Step 3 search | Which of hydro, wind and solar produces most in winter, and roughly how much less solar makes in December than in June. | Notes in my own words, with a reference for every figure. |
| 2 | Result 7 | The lowest monthly output of their 50 kW turbine and which month it was, so I can see how bad a dry summer gets. | A small table of month and output, copied exactly, with the source under it. |
| 3 | Result 3, then result 7 | Result 3's three trilemma issues (security, equity, sustainability) as a checklist for comparing options. Result 7's spending of its income as a real example. | A three-column comparison table, one column per energy source. |
Each question is linked to a source that scored well, and says exactly what to look for, so the research has a clear end point. Evidences criterion 5.
Welsh Government (2026) Energy generation and use in Wales: first combined report. Available at: https://www.gov.wales/energy-generation-and-use-wales-first-combined-report (Accessed: 14 October 2026)
Organisation, year, title, full web address and access date are all present, so anyone could find the same page. The access date matters because this page has already been corrected once. Evidences criterion 5.