Slide 1 of 7 · Settling starter · Art · Year 11
4 minutesImproving a digital art presentation
Nia’s practical work is good, but her digital presentation hides it. A moderator who has never met her will only see the 6 slides. Today you evaluate the layout and content of her presentation, check her image files, redesign one slide and justify your changes to a critical reader.
While the register is called: write your name, class and date on your worksheet, then read sections 1 and 4 of the stimulus, the brief and the feedback Nia received.
Starter question: What is Nia’s intention, and on which of her slides does it appear?
Slide 2 of 7 · Today’s brief and key words · Art · Year 11
6 minutesStep 1: read all 5 sections of the stimulus
Underline every problem and circle every strength. You will produce an evaluation grid for all 6 slides, 4 scale factor calculations, a sketched redesign of slide 4 with a 50 to 70 word annotation, and a 120 to 150 word note to Nia’s teacher.
Layout and hierarchy
Where things go on the slide, how big they are and what is seen first. Hierarchy makes the most important thing the most noticeable.
Annotation
Writing that records ideas, decisions and next steps (AO3). It explains, it does not just describe.
Resolution and aspect ratio
Resolution is how many pixels an image has. Aspect ratio is its shape, width compared with height.
Slide 3 of 7 · Step 2: evaluate each slide · Art · Year 11
12 minutesStep 2: one strength, the biggest problem, the AO it hides
For each of Nia’s 6 slides, find one strength (or write “none”) and the biggest problem. Say whether the problem is about layout or content, and which assessment objective it hides. Then rank the 3 slides that most need fixing: 1 is the most urgent.
| Slide | Strength | Biggest problem (layout or content?) | AO it hides | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | None. | Layout and content. Pale yellow on white cannot be read, and there is no big idea or intention, so the moderator starts with no idea what Nia is trying to do. | AO4 | 1 |
Slide 4 of 7 · Step 3: check the image files · Art · Year 11
8 minutesStep 3: scale factors, blur and distortion
Use the table in section 3 of the stimulus. Scale factor = size shown ÷ file size, for the width and for the height, to 2 decimal places. Above 1 means the image has been enlarged, so it blurs. Two different scale factors mean it has been distorted.
| Image | Width scale factor | Height scale factor | Blurred? | Distorted? | How to fix it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (Zobole painting) | 1200 ÷ 300 = 4.00 | 900 ÷ 225 = 4.00 | Yes | No | Find a larger image from a reliable source, such as a museum website, and credit it. Do not stretch a small file. |
Then: photograph 9 should keep the 4000 by 3000 shape. If it stays 240 pixels wide, how tall should it be? Show your working.
Slide 5 of 7 · Step 4: redesign slide 4 · Art · Year 11
15 minutesStep 4: sketch a new slide 4 and rewrite its annotation, on your own
(a) Sketch a new layout for slide 4 in the frame. Label where each image goes, its size, the heading and the annotation. Show which experiment Nia chose to take forward, and make sure the eye goes to it first.
(b) Rewrite Nia’s annotation, 50 to 70 words. Keep it true to what is on the slide: a panorama stitched from 5 photographs, a blue colour overlay, a mirror filter. Say what each edit did, which one best fits her intention and why, and what she will do next.
Nia’s current annotation: “I did a filter on these. It looks cool. The blue one is my favourite.”
Her intention: “I want the rows of houses to look like they are holding on to the sides of the valley.”
Slide 6 of 7 · Step 5 and self check · Art · Year 11
7 minutesStep 5: justify your 3 most important changes, then check against the criteria
In silence, write a note of 120 to 150 words to Nia’s teacher explaining your 3 most important changes across the whole presentation. For each: what you changed, why it matters to someone who has never met Nia, and which assessment objective it helps. Include 1 change about crediting a source. Then tick the criteria you have met and correct 1 thing.
- I judge both the layout and the content of each slide against its purpose and its audience, a moderator who has never met the pupil.
- I use the feedback and my own evaluation to make detailed, specific changes, not general ones like “make it better”.
- I can check image resolution and aspect ratio with correct calculations, and explain what the viewer would see.
- I refer correctly to the sources of images and information used in the presentation.
- I justify my changes to a critical reader, linking each one to an assessment objective.
Slide 7 of 7 · Plenary review · Art · Year 11
3 minutesQuick-check answers before handing in
Check your main answers before your worksheets are collected.
| Question | Correct answer |
|---|---|
| What are the scale factors for the final piece on slide 6, and what does the viewer see? | 2.25 by 2.25: enlarged, so it is blurred but not distorted. |
| How tall should photograph 9 be at 240 pixels wide? | 240 × 3000 ÷ 4000 = 180 pixels. |
| Why is “It looks cool. The blue one is my favourite.” a weak annotation? | It describes a feeling, not a decision, and does not link to the intention, so it hides AO2 and AO3. |