dcf.cymru stimulus sheet · Design Technology · Year 10
Six materials, with their real drawbacks. None of them is the right answer to everything.
| Material | Weight or thickness | Cost per m² | Kerbside recycling in Wales | Honest drawbacks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Recycled cartonboard | 350 gsm | £0.42 | Yes — card is collected almost everywhere | Grey-brown base, so printed colours look dull. No grease resistance: butter marks show through within a day. Recycled fibre is shorter, so it needs to be thicker than virgin board for the same stiffness. |
| B. Virgin FSC cartonboard | 300 gsm | £0.58 | Yes | Uses new fibre, even if from a certified forest. Best print quality of the six. Still no grease resistance. |
| C. Corrugated board, E-flute | 2 mm, about 500 gsm | £0.65 | Yes | Much the strongest, so it protects fragile contents, but it is bulky: you fit far fewer empty boxes on a delivery pallet, which pushes transport emissions up. Print is coarse. |
| D. rPET window film | 0.25 mm | £1.90 | In theory yes, in practice usually no | Made from recycled bottles, and it shows the product, which sells it. But a card box with a plastic window is a mixed-material pack: sorting lines commonly reject it, so the whole box ends up as residual waste rather than just the film. |
| E. PLA bioplastic film | 0.20 mm | £2.30 | No | Made from plant starch and marketed as compostable, but it only breaks down in industrial composting at high temperature. It is not accepted in Welsh kerbside food-waste or recycling collections, and if it goes in with the plastics it contaminates them. "Compostable" is not the same as "compostable here". |
| F. Greaseproof glassine paper | 40 gsm | £0.30 | Yes, and home compostable | Solves the grease problem cheaply as an inner liner, and paper inside a paper pack keeps the whole thing single-material. It is not fully greaseproof for more than about three days, and it has no structural strength at all. |