Cover lesson · PE · Year 9 · Advanced
DCF: Citizenship → Health and well-being
Also assessed, LNF: Numeracy → Learning that statistics represent data and that probability models chance helps us make informed inferences and decisions → Interpreting data
Name: Class: Date:
What this practises: digital health, privacy and data interpretation in PE. Pupils evaluate 6 sessions of wrist fitness tracker data from an invented Year 9 sprinter against chest-strap and stopwatch benchmarks. They calculate mean heart-rate error, recovery rate per minute, and percentage inaccuracy on short sprints versus steady runs, audit 4 privacy and well-being risks in the companion app, and write recommendations for safe use in school sport. No computers are needed.
Board: open the supply teacher presentation for board slides, timers and spoken script.
Print: this worksheet, one per pupil, and the stimulus sheet “PulseBand Go: Sprint Log, Benchmarks and App Privacy Settings”, one between two. Hand out calculators.
Run: 5 min settling starter · 5 min formulae and brief · 10 min Step 1 (heart-rate error and recovery rate) · 10 min Step 2 (GPS percentage inaccuracy) · 12 min Step 3 (privacy and well-being audit) · 5 min Step 4 (PE department recommendations) · 3 min plenary review. Total 50 minutes.
Collect: this worksheet. Quick checks: Step 1 heart-rate errors are 12, 11, 2, 15, 2, 12 bpm (total 54, mean 9 bpm; sprint mean 12.5 bpm vs steady mean 2 bpm); recovery rates are 24, 25, 22, 26, 20, 26 bpm/min. Step 2 GPS inaccuracies are 8%, 9%, 6%, 1%.
Wearable fitness trackers are popular in athletics, but optical wrist sensors and GPS chips have physical limits, and social fitness apps can expose personal data or encourage overtraining. You will test the accuracy of Nia’s PulseBand Go watch against benchmark equipment and audit her app settings.
(Peak HR − 2-min recovery HR) ÷ 2.(Error ÷ True measured value) × 100.(a) Use Table 1 on the stimulus sheet to complete the table below.
| Session | Type | Chest-strap peak (bpm) | Wrist peak (bpm) | Error: Chest − Wrist (bpm) | 2-min recovery HR (bpm) | Recovery rate per min: (Peak − Rec) ÷ 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Short sprint | 184 | 172 | 12 | 136 | 24 bpm/min |
| 2 | Short sprint | 188 | 177 | 138 | ||
| 3 | Steady run | 170 | 168 | 126 | ||
| 4 | Short sprint | 192 | 177 | 140 | ||
| 5 | Steady run | 156 | 154 | 116 | ||
| 6 | Short sprint | 186 | 174 | 134 |
(b) Calculate the mean heart-rate error across all 6 sessions, then compare the mean error for the 4 short sprint sessions (Sessions 1, 2, 4 and 6) against the 2 steady runs (Sessions 3 and 5). Why does the wrist sensor struggle on sprints?
(a) Use Table 2 on the stimulus sheet to calculate the distance error and percentage inaccuracy for each run.
| Run description | True distance (m) | Wrist GPS (m) | Distance error (m) | Percentage inaccuracy: (Error ÷ True) × 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 m straight sprint | 100 | 92 | 8 m | 8% |
| 200 m bend sprint | 200 | 182 | ||
| 400 m one-lap sprint | 400 | 376 | ||
| 2,000 m straight park path | 2,000 | 1,980 |
(b) Why is the percentage inaccuracy highest on the 200 m bend sprint (9%) and lowest on the 2,000 m straight park path (1%)? Why should Nia keep using a stopwatch for 100 m timing?
Read Section 3 of the stimulus sheet. For each setting, explain the safeguarding or well-being risk and write the safe setting Nia should use instead.
| App setting | Why this is a privacy or well-being risk | Safe setting to choose instead |
|---|---|---|
| A: Public profile (name, age 14, school, photo) | ||
| B: Full street GPS map (14 Heol y Castell, Tue/Thu 07:15) | ||
| C: Live Location Beacon (enabled for 312 followers) | ||
| D: 21:30 “Streak lost!” alerts (exercising with a sore ankle) |
Write a 4 to 5 sentence recommendation to the Head of PE explaining when wearable wrist trackers are accurate enough to use, when benchmark equipment is needed instead, and what privacy and well-being rules pupils must follow. Quote at least two figures from Steps 1 and 2.
(15 ÷ 192) × 100 to 1 decimal place, and compare it with Session 5 (Easy jog) using (2 ÷ 156) × 100.distance ÷ time) on the 100 m sprint using the stopwatch time (13.4 s) versus the GPS distance and auto-split time (92 m in 14.6 s).