Cover lesson · Science · Year 9 · Intermediate
DCF: Producing → Sourcing, searching and planning digital content
Name: Class: Date:
Print: this sheet, one per pupil, and the stimulus sheet “Bryn Ysgawen: which renewable energy?”, one between two. The search results are printed, so no computers are needed. If computers are available, pupils may try their Step 3 searches for real in the last ten minutes, but they should finish the paper steps first.
Run: 4 min read the brief aloud · 8 min Step 1, the science check · 8 min Step 2, focus the question · 8 min Step 3, plan the searches · 14 min Step 4, judge the eight results · 8 min Step 5, the research plan · 4 min Step 6, write a reference.
Collect: this sheet. Pupils are planning research, not writing the final answer, so a good sheet is full of questions, search terms and judgements, not conclusions about which energy source is “best”.
A village in the Welsh hills wants to generate its own renewable energy and has asked your class to find out which source would suit it best. Before anyone can answer that, someone has to plan the research. What exactly are we trying to find out? What will we type into a search engine? Which of the results can we trust? You are going to do that planning, using a printed page of real and invented search results.
Use the science fact card on the stimulus sheet to complete the table. Then decide whether each resource is possible in Bryn Ysgawen.
| Resource | Energy store it starts from | Predictable? (yes / partly / no) | Possible in Bryn Ysgawen? Give the evidence from the brief. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wind | |||
| Hydroelectric | |||
| Solar | |||
| Tidal | |||
| Biomass |
“Is renewable energy good?” is far too broad to research. Rewrite it as one main question about Bryn Ysgawen that could actually be answered.
Now break it into three smaller questions. Make one about the science, one about the village (does it have the resource?) and one about people, cost or the environment.
A search engine only matches words, so the words you choose decide what you get. Use short keywords, not whole sentences, and at least one of these techniques in each search:
| Technique | What it does |
|---|---|
| "run of river" | Quotation marks find those words together, in that order. |
| site:gov.wales | Only shows results from that website. Try site:ac.uk for universities. |
| -sale | A minus sign in front of a word removes results that contain it. |
| filetype:pdf | Only shows PDF documents, which are often full reports. |
| Smaller question | Exactly what I would type | What this search should leave out, and why that helps |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 |
Score each result on the stimulus sheet out of 2 for each question, then decide: Use, Use with care or Reject.
| Question | 2 points | 1 point | 0 points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who wrote it? | A named organisation or expert responsible for the topic | Named, but not independent or not expert | Anonymous |
| When? | Dated and recent (last 2 years) | 2 to 5 years old | Older than 5 years, or no date |
| Why was it written? | To inform | To inform, but the writer has something to gain | To sell, or to get clicks |
| Evidence? | Figures, with where they came from | Some figures, no sources | Opinion only |
| Result | Who | When | Why | Evidence | Total /8 | Use / Use with care / Reject |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 8 |
(a) Result 1 says an error was found and a figure was corrected. Does that make the page more or less trustworthy? Explain.
(b) Result 1 gives 55% (for 2024) and result 4 gives 27% (for 2019). Give two reasons the figures could differ, and say how you would quote a figure in your research so that nobody is misled.
| Smaller question | Best result(s) to start with | What exactly I need to find out | How I will record it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 |
Write a full reference for result 1 in this format: